|
.
. . Nearly
a century ago, Europe and its surrounding nations, both physically nearby
and philosophically so, fought what was then known as The Great War. This
war had many other names and is now called World War I. One of its many
names that is perhaps worth a greater notice, though, was 'The War to
End All Wars'. In a way, this is a very appropriate name, despite the
fact that it did not end war, but in fact can be said with reasonable
confidence to have started the next, much more deadly war. For, World
War I, on leaving the nations that it had so brutally torn, took away
with it the very cause of so many European wars before it. With regard,
at least, to Euopean nations, the glory of fighting for one's country
was gone.
. . . While
everyone feels some pride in their country, especially those of us living
in the United States, people fight wars, now, for moral or economic reasons.
Nations go to war, now, not for any glory of battle but because they have
to, because a certain goal needs to be met. Certainly this is not entirely
true, and as always there are exceptions, but the world in general does
not come close to what it was only a few centuries ago, so far as warfare.
Perhaps it is not nationalism that has died, but simply honor, nobility,
the glory of battle. There is not much art or romance in pulling a trigger
when compared to the graceful swords and castles of our further, often
idealized, past.
. . . It is just that past, though, that
comes to my mind as I listen or work on either of the two pieces that
have sprung from me when I considered war. I have lived as a part of a
group that was born only just after vietnam, whose parents did not talk
of war, whose only experience with war is the detached affairs of Desert
Storm or the already seemingly usual affairs in the Balkans. We were part
of a generation, or part of several even, born of Dungeons & Dragons,
children who grew up playing video games where the idea was to blow as
many things up as possible. Some of us, at least, were the heroes when
the enemy was driven from the noble castle at Fabul and felt an agony
when Damcyan was bombed. What these places are does not matter, but that
we felt as we did sets us apart from generations before us. While the
pain was very real for those civilians who were casualties of the wars
in the second half of this century, it has come to be expected that no
targets are out of the question. The difference is that by whatever picture
of war has been painted for us, we feel an outrage on seeing a peaceful
town destroyed because it was the sole source of metals. We feel pride
and honor after having successfully defeated the enemy, who is of course
wrong. All this without a word of government propaganda.
. . . Of course, not everyone plays video
games. On the whole, not too many read the books that paint this picture.
Most people get, very likely, little if any of this that I speak of, but
the idea is there, and it was given to us when we were children. And when
the Uncle Sam needs a few good men, will we remember the pain of war from
our history classes or will we remember the glory we earned as little
children by beating the bad guys, once and for all...
|